On responsibility, leadership and in-between

The differences between the revisions of standard ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 9001:2015 do not begin and end with process-orientation and risk management.

The old chapter 5, from the 2008 revision, was called Management Responsibility. In the new, 2015, revision it has been separated in two, and the part which remains in chapter 5 has now received a new overall chapter title: Leadership. This change is what I would like to address here now.

At first glance, one may ask: What difference does it make? Why bother changing the name?

Well, I am convinced that this change is not only required, but precise and excellent. I hope you will not only learn to appreciate it, but come to fully replace the two concepts in your own mind and overall approach to Quality Assurance.

Atlante carrying the globe on his shoulders.

Statue of the Atlante carrying the world, on the Doge’s palace, Venice. Image source: The Art Post Blog.

When most people think on the word “responsibility”, they immediately see a picture of a burden, a duty, a heavy load which they need to carry. Most managers do not believe their workers would take responsibility of their own volition, therefore, they feel the need to set it up for them and make sure they carry it.

A person who believes that people generally do not take responsibility if they can avoid it, and therefore need someone who would load it on them and keep it there; can such a person be happy for having himself to take on responsibility? I believe not. He is also most likely to feel the responsibility as a burden he has no choice but carry, weighing heavily on his shoulders.

Taking into account the spirit of the standard ISO 9001, as it has always been ever since it came out for the first time, I can say without a doubt that this has never been its authors’ intention.

The intention was, from the start, that the management should lead by personal example, and should therefore, first and foremost, take the responsibility itself; that they do all that they chose to do of their own free will and out of integrity, before developing expectations from people at any lower organizational level to take on responsibility for their part.

It is quite clear that this message did not come across, and the chapter was taken literally as a dictate of requirements and demands – by the standard from the management: the standard demands that management take responsibility, whether they wish to or not, and carry this burden henceforth.

Photo of King Edward VIII

King Eduard VIII. Image source: The History Jar website.

Basically, this boils down to burden vs choice. To “I have to do it” vs “I get to do it”. And the way the previous title was read and understood was the first, and not the second of the above.

In his abdication letter in 1936, the king of Great Britain, Edward VIII, wrote:

“I have found it impossible to carry the heavy burden of responsibility and to discharge my duties as King as I would wish to do without the help and support of the woman I love. I now quit altogether public affairs, and I lay down my burden”.

Aside from his forbidden love story, the apparent trigger for his abdication, Edward saw his kingship as a great burden, and not as a calling, not as an opportunity for leadership. In such a case, it is small wonder that he chose to get rid of the burden (which brought out only negative emotions) and go with his lover (whereas here the emotions were positive).

Now, in the 2015 revision of the ISO 9001 standard, this was corrected.

No more talk of responsibility. The word “management” disappears as well.

Now it is all about leadership.

Which begs the next question: what is leadership and how is it different from management?

ILlustration: manager

The manager, who empowers himself at the expense of others. Illustration image, stock photo.

Well, first let’s state the obvious answer. We even have jokes and parables made on this subject. For instance, we have a saying in Hebrew:

“Those who know how to do something – do it, those who don’t – manage”.

If you ask the workers at many workplaces what they think of the concept of “manager”, they would tell you: “The one who interferes with our work”. In many workplaces, organizations and plants, the majority of workers claim that the managers are just “out of touch with reality and don’t understand what is really done and how”. They hardly ever listen and or ask the workers about their job, usually telling them what to do and how to do it.

Illisration: leader showing alternative reality

A leader sharing vision. Illustration image, stock photo.

If so, then what is a leader?

A leader can see where you should go, where he wants to lead. He has a vision. Thus far he may not differ much from the manager. But he knows how to lead the people there without resorting to force, without manipulation, but willingly. He can share his vision with them, allow them to see that same better future he can see and motivate themselves to make the journey which will take them there

He knows he cannot push everyone himself in order to get there, so he would take care that they may motivate themselves, and maintain this self-motivation while he is absent. He will help to renew it again and again, inspire them, and, naturally, lead by personal example.

The intention in ISO 9001:2015 revision is to turn the tables. Free all the managers of their burdens and their heavy loads, and inspire them in a lighter spirit. Breathe new life into them, where they may become leaders, not managers. To lead by choice, not out of duty.

Picture of Lao Tze

Lao Tze. Image source: Wikispaces.

At the end of the day, the boss, or the manager, mostly sees their role as the one who demands the execution of this or that in this or that particular way, limiting it to a narrow window for possibilities. By the very demand he creates resistance and resentment, while the limitation states that he doesn’t really see the individual workers at all, but only the demand and his own solution for it. In this situation the people will do as they are told, but not a whit more, and only as long as the demand is supported by control.

On the other side, a leader demands nothing. He brings vision and inspiration, followed by expectation for the best you can possibly do – with all the possibilities wide open. The result is that people do on their own, without being told, and surprise everybody, including themselves.

The Chinese philosopher and founder of Taoism, Lao Tze, has said:

“A leader is best, when people barely know he exists, when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: ‘We did it ourselves’.”

And the next two citations belong to John Calvin Maxwell,

Photo of John C.Maxwell

John C.Maxwell. Image source: The John Maxwell Co. website.

an American author, speaker for leadership and pastor:

“Leaders become great not because of their power, but because of their ability to empower others”.

“A leader is one who knows the way, walks the way and shows the way”.

Illustration: leader vs manager

Boss/manager vs Leader. Image source: stock photos.

All this is indeed the role of a successful Quality Assurance professional, for then his job is no longer a constant struggle with the workers, and he becomes an inspiration to the people who go along with him. A willing cooperation, bringing results with no glass ceiling, no limits.

Then do we get Quality Assurance with a smile, struggle-free.

So, are you ready to become leaders?

Like, Share and Feedback

If you liked this article, please Like it and Share with your friends and colleagues in the links below or on top right of the page.

If you would like to comment on it in any way, please do, I shall be happy to receive any feedback.

You may also join the mailing list, on top of the page, and receive updates of new articles posted.

Thank you.



Quality Assurance Engineer ICQE since 1996, Aerospace Engineer B.Sc., Technion graduate. Lecturer in Quality Assurance Engineering for ICQE qualification and in QA since 1996; first at the Kinneret Academic Colledge, the external studies department, then also at other colledge up North (Krayot, Shelomi). Since 2008 - self employed at Maof Dvora: consulting, holding seminars and lectures at plants in the North of Israel. Involved in a wide range of activities and work: education, website design, art, coaching, Judaism and more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *